PITCHER MATCHUP

Cionel Pérez vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cionel Pérez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cionel Pérez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .329vs RHH xwOBA .352Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 35%SV 28%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Curveball 12%Slider 7%Cutter 1%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cionel Pérez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .328
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (28% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 432 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .370
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .426 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (28% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 528 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BH Bryce Harper LHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (28% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 AB Alec Bohm RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (28% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (28% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 410 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (28% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 482 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JC Justin Crawford LHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (28% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (28% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 ES Edmundo Sosa RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edmundo Sosa
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (28% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-28 game page →