PITCHER MATCHUP

Cionel Pérez vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cionel Pérez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cionel Pérez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .308vs RHH xwOBA .352Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 35%SV 30%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Curveball 10%Slider 6%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cionel Pérez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .326
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (30% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 495 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (30% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 719 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .359
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .416 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (30% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 615 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (30% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 457 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 AB Alec Bohm RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (30% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 510 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (30% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 573 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (30% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 481 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (30% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (30% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.