PITCHER MATCHUP

Cionel Pérez vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cionel Pérez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cionel Pérez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .307vs RHH xwOBA .353Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 35%SV 30%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Curveball 10%Slider 6%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cionel Pérez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (30% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 504 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .361
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .417 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (30% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 621 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BH Bryce Harper LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (30% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 BS Bryson Stott LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (30% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 583 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (30% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC Justin Crawford LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (30% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (30% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH Derek Hill RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Derek Hill
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • SV (30% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (30% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.