PITCHER MATCHUP

Cionel Pérez vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cionel Pérez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cionel Pérez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .311vs RHH xwOBA .350Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 35%SV 29%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Curveball 11%Slider 6%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cionel Pérez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .326
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (29% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 454 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 362 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (29% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 663 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AB Alec Bohm RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (29% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 460 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (29% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 446 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BH Bryce Harper LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (29% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .364
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .422 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (29% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 564 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BS Bryson Stott LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (29% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 527 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (29% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Sinker (35% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (29% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.