PITCHER MATCHUP

Christian Scott vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Christian Scott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Christian Scott's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .299vs RHH xwOBA .319Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Sweeper 22%Cutter 16%Splitter 5%Slider 4%Curveball 3%Sinker 2%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Christian Scott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 448 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .413 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 421 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-22 game page →