PITCHER MATCHUP

Christian Scott vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Christian Scott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Christian Scott's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .297vs RHH xwOBA .305Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Sweeper 22%Cutter 17%Splitter 6%Slider 3%Curveball 3%Sinker 2%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Christian Scott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .412 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 446 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.