PITCHER MATCHUP

Christian Scott vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Christian Scott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Christian Scott's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .297vs RHH xwOBA .305Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Sweeper 22%Cutter 17%Splitter 6%Slider 3%Curveball 3%Sinker 2%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Christian Scott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ED Elly De La Cruz SH .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elly De La Cruz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 624 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB JJ Bleday LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Matt McLain RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt McLain
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 551 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TS Tyler Stephenson RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DM Dane Myers RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dane Myers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 KH Ke'Bryan Hayes RHB .277
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ke'Bryan Hayes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NM Noelvi Marte RHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Noelvi Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.