PITCHER MATCHUP

Christian Scott vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Christian Scott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Christian Scott's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .295vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 49%Sweeper 22%Cutter 15%Splitter 6%Slider 5%Curveball 2%Sinker 2%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Christian Scott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ED Elly De La Cruz SH .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elly De La Cruz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 570 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 JB JJ Bleday LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 389 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 493 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TS Tyler Stephenson RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 512 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TF TJ Friedl LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Friedl
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 NM Noelvi Marte RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Noelvi Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DM Dane Myers RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dane Myers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.