PITCHER MATCHUP

Christian Scott vs Tampa Bay Rays

How the Tampa Bay Rays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Christian Scott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Christian Scott's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .297vs RHH xwOBA .305Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Sweeper 22%Cutter 17%Splitter 6%Slider 3%Curveball 3%Sinker 2%

How the Tampa Bay Rays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Tampa Bay Rays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Christian Scott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 JC Junior Caminero RHB .363
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Junior Caminero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .404 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 YD Yandy Díaz RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Yandy Díaz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 495 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JA Jonathan Aranda LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonathan Aranda
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 408 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CS Chandler Simpson LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chandler Simpson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 373 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 LH Liam Hicks LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Liam Hicks
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CM Cedric Mullins LHB .274
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cedric Mullins
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 520 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TW Taylor Walls SH .268
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Walls
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JD Jonny DeLuca RHB .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonny DeLuca
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RP Richie Palacios LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Richie Palacios
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.