PITCHER MATCHUP

Christian Scott vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Christian Scott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Christian Scott's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .314vs RHH xwOBA .346Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 50%Sweeper 22%Cutter 14%Splitter 7%Slider 5%Sinker 2%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Christian Scott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (50% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (7% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .361
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (50% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 527 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (7% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .468 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 BH Bryce Harper LHB .379
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (50% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .423 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (7% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 AB Alec Bohm RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (50% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (7% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (50% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 410 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (50% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 481 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (7% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 JC Justin Crawford LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (50% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (50% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (7% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 ES Edmundo Sosa RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edmundo Sosa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (50% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (7% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-27 game page →