PITCHER MATCHUP

Christian Scott vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Christian Scott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Christian Scott's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .295vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 49%Sweeper 22%Cutter 15%Splitter 6%Slider 5%Curveball 2%Sinker 2%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Christian Scott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 454 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 663 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AB Alec Bohm RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 460 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 446 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BH Bryce Harper LHB .379
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 564 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BS Bryson Stott LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 527 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.