PITCHER MATCHUP

Christian Scott vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Christian Scott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Christian Scott's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .297vs RHH xwOBA .305Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Sweeper 22%Cutter 17%Splitter 6%Slider 3%Curveball 3%Sinker 2%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Christian Scott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 495 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 719 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 615 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .380
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 457 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AB Alec Bohm RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 510 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 573 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 481 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.