PITCHER MATCHUP

Christian Scott vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Christian Scott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Christian Scott's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .297vs RHH xwOBA .305Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Sweeper 22%Cutter 17%Splitter 6%Slider 3%Curveball 3%Sinker 2%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Christian Scott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 504 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 621 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BH Bryce Harper LHB .381
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .403 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BS Bryson Stott LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 583 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC Justin Crawford LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH Derek Hill RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Derek Hill
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.