PITCHER MATCHUP

Christian Scott vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Christian Scott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Christian Scott's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .297vs RHH xwOBA .304Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Sweeper 22%Cutter 17%Splitter 5%Slider 4%Curveball 3%Sinker 2%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Christian Scott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 514 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 432 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 SK Steven Kwan LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 664 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JR José Ramírez SH .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 593 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AM Angel Martínez SH .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 PB Patrick Bailey SH .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.