PITCHER MATCHUP

Christian Scott vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Christian Scott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Christian Scott's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .308vs RHH xwOBA .319Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Sweeper 23%Cutter 16%Splitter 5%Slider 4%Curveball 3%Sinker 2%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Christian Scott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 616 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 421 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .410 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CK Christian Koss RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Jonah Cox RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .232 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-06 game page →