PITCHER MATCHUP

Christian Scott vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Christian Scott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Christian Scott's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .308vs RHH xwOBA .319Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Sweeper 23%Cutter 16%Splitter 5%Slider 4%Curveball 3%Sinker 2%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Christian Scott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 556 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 496 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 313 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 389 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 409 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SF Sal Frelick LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 517 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.