PITCHER MATCHUP

Christian Scott vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Christian Scott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Christian Scott's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .295vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 49%Sweeper 22%Cutter 15%Splitter 6%Slider 5%Curveball 2%Sinker 2%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Christian Scott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 MO Matt Olson LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 625 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 OA Ozzie Albies SH .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 457 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 MH Michael Harris II LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 AR Austin Riley RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MD Mauricio Dubón RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mauricio Dubón
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 374 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 LT Lane Thomas RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lane Thomas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 RA Ronald Acuña Jr. RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ronald Acuña Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.