PITCHER MATCHUP

Christian Scott vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Christian Scott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Christian Scott's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .297vs RHH xwOBA .305Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Sweeper 22%Cutter 17%Splitter 6%Slider 3%Curveball 3%Sinker 2%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Christian Scott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 MO Matt Olson LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 690 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 OA Ozzie Albies SH .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 525 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 MH Michael Harris II LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 AR Austin Riley RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .356
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 RA Ronald Acuña Jr. RHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ronald Acuña Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 540 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JJ Jim Jarvis LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jim Jarvis
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SM Sean Murphy RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sean Murphy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.