PITCHER MATCHUP

Christian Scott vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Christian Scott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Christian Scott's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .297vs RHH xwOBA .305Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Sweeper 22%Cutter 17%Splitter 6%Slider 3%Curveball 3%Sinker 2%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Christian Scott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 MO Matt Olson LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 675 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 OA Ozzie Albies SH .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 512 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 MH Michael Harris II LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 424 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MD Mauricio Dubón RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mauricio Dubón
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 413 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AR Austin Riley RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 495 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .359
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 RA Ronald Acuña Jr. RHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ronald Acuña Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 533 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DS Dominic Smith LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.