PITCHER MATCHUP

Christian Scott vs Houston Astros

How the Houston Astros's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Christian Scott's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Christian Scott's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .297vs RHH xwOBA .305Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Sweeper 22%Cutter 17%Splitter 6%Slider 3%Curveball 3%Sinker 2%

How the Houston Astros's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Houston Astros's top-9-by-AB hitters against Christian Scott, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 CW Christian Walker RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Walker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 514 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 YA Yordan Alvarez SH .388
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Yordan Alvarez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .424 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .438 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 IP Isaac Paredes RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Isaac Paredes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 501 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JA Jose Altuve RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Altuve
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 487 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CS Cam Smith RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cam Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DV Daulton Varsho LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daulton Varsho
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 437 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JP Jeremy Peña RHB .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeremy Peña
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 YD Yainer Diaz RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Yainer Diaz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TT Taylor Trammell LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Trammell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (6% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.