PITCHER MATCHUP

Chris Bassitt vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Chris Bassitt's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Chris Bassitt's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .353vs RHH xwOBA .293Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 39%Curveball 18%Cutter 18%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Sweeper 6%Changeup 5%Slider 3%Splitter 2%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Chris Bassitt, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .328
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .361
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .405 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 586 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 TG Trent Grisham LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 JC José Caballero RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 369 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.