PITCHER MATCHUP

Chris Bassitt vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Chris Bassitt's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Chris Bassitt's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .358vs RHH xwOBA .286Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 40%Cutter 18%Curveball 18%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Sweeper 6%Changeup 5%Slider 3%Splitter 3%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Chris Bassitt, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 500 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 TG Trent Grisham LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 426 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC José Caballero RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 345 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 491 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 341 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.