PITCHER MATCHUP

Chris Bassitt vs Tampa Bay Rays

How the Tampa Bay Rays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Chris Bassitt's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Chris Bassitt's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .358vs RHH xwOBA .286Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 40%Cutter 18%Curveball 18%Four-Seam Fastball 8%Sweeper 6%Changeup 5%Splitter 3%Slider 3%

How the Tampa Bay Rays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Tampa Bay Rays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Chris Bassitt, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .306
  1. 1 JC Junior Caminero RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Junior Caminero
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 YD Yandy Díaz RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Yandy Díaz
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 399 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 436 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JA Jonathan Aranda LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonathan Aranda
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CS Chandler Simpson LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chandler Simpson
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 LH Liam Hicks LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Liam Hicks
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CM Cedric Mullins LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cedric Mullins
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 477 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 TW Taylor Walls SH .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Walls
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 348 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 RP Richie Palacios LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Richie Palacios
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NF Nick Fortes RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Fortes
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.