PITCHER MATCHUP

Chris Bassitt vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Chris Bassitt's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Chris Bassitt's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .355vs RHH xwOBA .294Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 40%Curveball 18%Cutter 18%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Sweeper 6%Changeup 4%Slider 3%Splitter 2%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Chris Bassitt, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 356 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MS Marcus Semien RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 341 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 521 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .220 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BB Brett Baty LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 363 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .238 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 FL Francisco Lindor SH .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 614 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JS Juan Soto LHB .387
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Juan Soto
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 350 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .442 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 JY Jared Young LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Young
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-16 game page →