PITCHER MATCHUP

Chris Bassitt vs St. Louis Cardinals

How the St. Louis Cardinals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Chris Bassitt's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Chris Bassitt's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .353vs RHH xwOBA .293Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 39%Curveball 18%Cutter 18%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Sweeper 6%Changeup 5%Slider 3%Splitter 2%

How the St. Louis Cardinals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the St. Louis Cardinals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Chris Bassitt, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 JW Jordan Walker RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jordan Walker
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 AB Alec Burleson LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Burleson
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 532 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 IH Iván Herrera RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Iván Herrera
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JW JJ Wetherholt LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Wetherholt
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MW Masyn Winn RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Masyn Winn
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 NC Nathan Church LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Church
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JF José Fermín RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Fermín
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 NG Nolan Gorman LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Gorman
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 PP Pedro Pagés RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pedro Pagés
    • Sinker (39% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.