PITCHER MATCHUP

Chris Bassitt vs St. Louis Cardinals

How the St. Louis Cardinals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Chris Bassitt's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Chris Bassitt's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .358vs RHH xwOBA .286Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 40%Cutter 18%Curveball 18%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Sweeper 6%Changeup 5%Slider 3%Splitter 3%

How the St. Louis Cardinals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the St. Louis Cardinals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Chris Bassitt, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 JW Jordan Walker RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jordan Walker
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 AB Alec Burleson LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Burleson
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 500 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 IH Iván Herrera RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Iván Herrera
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JW JJ Wetherholt LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Wetherholt
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MW Masyn Winn RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Masyn Winn
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 531 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 NC Nathan Church LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Church
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JF José Fermín RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Fermín
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BJ Blaze Jordan RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Blaze Jordan
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
  9. 9 PP Pedro Pagés RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pedro Pagés
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .238 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-25 game page →