PITCHER MATCHUP

Chris Bassitt vs Toronto Blue Jays

How the Toronto Blue Jays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Chris Bassitt's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Chris Bassitt's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .357vs RHH xwOBA .290Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 40%Curveball 18%Cutter 18%Four-Seam Fastball 9%Sweeper 6%Changeup 5%Slider 3%Splitter 2%

How the Toronto Blue Jays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Toronto Blue Jays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Chris Bassitt, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 EC Ernie Clement SH .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ernie Clement
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KO Kazuma Okamoto RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kazuma Okamoto
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vladimir Guerrero Jr. RHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 442 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AG Andrés Giménez LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrés Giménez
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GS George Springer RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. George Springer
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 359 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 NL Nathan Lukes LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Lukes
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JS Jesús Sánchez LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jesús Sánchez
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 MS Myles Straw RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Myles Straw
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AK Alejandro Kirk RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Kirk
    • Sinker (40% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (9% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (2% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-11 game page →