PITCHER MATCHUP

Casey Legumina vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Casey Legumina's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Casey Legumina's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .329vs RHH xwOBA .300Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 45%Sinker 21%Sweeper 14%Changeup 11%Slider 8%Unknown 1%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Casey Legumina, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 429 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 CK Colt Keith LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 400 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 419 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GT Gleyber Torres RHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gleyber Torres
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JB Javier Báez SH .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Báez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 MC Max Clark LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Clark
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.