PITCHER MATCHUP

Casey Legumina vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Casey Legumina's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Casey Legumina's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .321vs RHH xwOBA .303Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 45%Sinker 21%Sweeper 14%Changeup 12%Slider 7%Unknown 1%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Casey Legumina, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 665 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JP Joc Pederson LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.