PITCHER MATCHUP

Casey Legumina vs Toronto Blue Jays

How the Toronto Blue Jays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Casey Legumina's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Casey Legumina's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .341vs RHH xwOBA .309Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 45%Sinker 20%Sweeper 15%Changeup 12%Slider 6%Unknown 1%

How the Toronto Blue Jays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Toronto Blue Jays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Casey Legumina, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 EC Ernie Clement SH .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ernie Clement
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 VG Vladimir Guerrero Jr. RHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 424 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KO Kazuma Okamoto RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kazuma Okamoto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AG Andrés Giménez LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrés Giménez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 411 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 DV Daulton Varsho LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daulton Varsho
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 GS George Springer RHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. George Springer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 400 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 NL Nathan Lukes LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Lukes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BV Brandon Valenzuela SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Valenzuela
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MS Myles Straw RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Myles Straw
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-23 game page →