PITCHER MATCHUP

Carson Seymour vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Carson Seymour's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Carson Seymour's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .392vs RHH xwOBA .355Seasons 2026–2025
Sinker 37%Slider 21%Four-Seam Fastball 20%Cutter 17%Curveball 3%Splitter 1%Unknown 1%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Carson Seymour, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .336
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 633 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 526 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AP Andy Pages RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 491 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 337 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 505 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TE Tommy Edman SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WS Will Smith RHB .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.