PITCHER MATCHUP

Carson Seymour vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Carson Seymour's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Carson Seymour's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .389vs RHH xwOBA .352Seasons 2026–2025
Sinker 37%Slider 21%Four-Seam Fastball 20%Cutter 17%Curveball 3%Splitter 1%Unknown 1%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Carson Seymour, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .334
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 643 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AP Andy Pages RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .358
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TE Tommy Edman SH .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WS Will Smith RHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 AF Alex Freeland SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (17% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.