PITCHER MATCHUP

Carson Palmquist vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Carson Palmquist's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Carson Palmquist's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .353vs RHH xwOBA .363Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 42%Sweeper 33%Cutter 12%Sinker 11%Changeup 3%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Carson Palmquist, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (33% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 506 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (33% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 337 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (33% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 TG Trent Grisham LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (33% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 551 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (33% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC José Caballero RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 348 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (33% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (33% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (33% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (33% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.