PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .279vs RHH xwOBA .276Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Cutter 24%Sinker 16%Curveball 11%Slider 1%Sweeper 1%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .327
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .415 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.