PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .291vs RHH xwOBA .277Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Cutter 25%Sinker 15%Curveball 10%Slider 1%Sweeper 1%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LA Luisangel Acuña RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luisangel Acuña
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 EQ Edgar Quero SH .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edgar Quero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-29 game page →