PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .283vs RHH xwOBA .278Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Cutter 24%Sinker 16%Curveball 10%Slider 1%Sweeper 1%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .329
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 RG Riley Greene LHB .362
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Riley Greene
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 537 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .413 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 415 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CK Colt Keith LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 409 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 GT Gleyber Torres RHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gleyber Torres
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 482 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JO James Outman LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Outman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.