PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .274vs RHH xwOBA .275Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Cutter 25%Sinker 16%Curveball 11%Slider 1%Sweeper 1%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .329
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 461 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 RG Riley Greene LHB .365
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Riley Greene
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 564 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GT Gleyber Torres RHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gleyber Torres
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 523 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JB Javier Báez SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Báez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MC Max Clark LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Clark
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.