PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .282vs RHH xwOBA .276Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Cutter 25%Sinker 15%Curveball 10%Slider 2%Sweeper 1%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .331
  1. 1 RG Riley Greene LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Riley Greene
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 494 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 377 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CK Colt Keith LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MV Matt Vierling RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Vierling
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 KC Kerry Carpenter LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kerry Carpenter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 1 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-30 game page →