PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .284vs RHH xwOBA .281Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Cutter 25%Sinker 15%Curveball 10%Slider 1%Sweeper 1%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ED Elly De La Cruz SH .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elly De La Cruz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 574 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 JB JJ Bleday LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 499 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MM Matt McLain RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt McLain
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TS Tyler Stephenson RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 336 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 519 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 TF TJ Friedl LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Friedl
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 449 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 NM Noelvi Marte RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Noelvi Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.