PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .273vs RHH xwOBA .277Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Cutter 24%Sinker 16%Curveball 11%Slider 1%Sweeper 1%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ED Elly De La Cruz SH .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elly De La Cruz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 624 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB JJ Bleday LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Matt McLain RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt McLain
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 551 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 SS Spencer Steer RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Steer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 467 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 DM Dane Myers RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dane Myers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 KH Ke'Bryan Hayes RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ke'Bryan Hayes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NM Noelvi Marte RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Noelvi Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.