PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .290vs RHH xwOBA .278Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 49%Cutter 25%Sinker 14%Curveball 10%Slider 2%Sweeper 1%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 SS Spencer Steer RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Steer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 427 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 330 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MM Matt McLain RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt McLain
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 TS Tyler Stephenson RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 464 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JB JJ Bleday LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 348 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 493 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BD Blake Dunn RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Blake Dunn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DM Dane Myers RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dane Myers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-19 game page →