PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs Tampa Bay Rays

How the Tampa Bay Rays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .283vs RHH xwOBA .277Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Cutter 25%Sinker 16%Curveball 10%Slider 1%Sweeper 1%

How the Tampa Bay Rays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Tampa Bay Rays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 JC Junior Caminero RHB .363
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Junior Caminero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 YD Yandy Díaz RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Yandy Díaz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JA Jonathan Aranda LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonathan Aranda
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CS Chandler Simpson LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chandler Simpson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 323 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 LH Liam Hicks LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Liam Hicks
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CM Cedric Mullins LHB .279
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cedric Mullins
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 480 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TW Taylor Walls SH .278
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Walls
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 350 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 RP Richie Palacios LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Richie Palacios
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NF Nick Fortes RHB .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Fortes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.