PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs Tampa Bay Rays

How the Tampa Bay Rays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .294vs RHH xwOBA .285Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Cutter 25%Sinker 15%Curveball 10%Slider 2%Sweeper 1%

How the Tampa Bay Rays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Tampa Bay Rays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 JC Junior Caminero RHB .366
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Junior Caminero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 YD Yandy Díaz RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Yandy Díaz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 367 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JA Jonathan Aranda LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonathan Aranda
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CS Chandler Simpson LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chandler Simpson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CM Cedric Mullins LHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cedric Mullins
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TW Taylor Walls SH .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Walls
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 NF Nick Fortes RHB .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Fortes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BW Ben Williamson RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Williamson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RP Richie Palacios LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Richie Palacios
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-06 game page →