PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .273vs RHH xwOBA .277Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Cutter 24%Sinker 16%Curveball 11%Slider 1%Sweeper 1%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .328
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 504 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 719 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .371
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 621 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .438 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .375
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AB Alec Bohm RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 517 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 386 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 583 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.