PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .291vs RHH xwOBA .277Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Cutter 25%Sinker 15%Curveball 10%Slider 1%Sweeper 1%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .330
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .372
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 548 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .440 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AB Alec Bohm RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 337 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .378
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 510 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JC Justin Crawford LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 ES Edmundo Sosa RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edmundo Sosa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-25 game page →