PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .280vs RHH xwOBA .279Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Cutter 24%Sinker 16%Curveball 11%Slider 1%Sweeper 1%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .328
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 476 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 344 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 691 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 376 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .372
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 597 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .444 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AB Alec Bohm RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 485 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 364 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BH Bryce Harper LHB .378
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 444 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BS Bryson Stott LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 556 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 411 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.