PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .288vs RHH xwOBA .277Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Cutter 25%Sinker 15%Curveball 10%Slider 1%Sweeper 1%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .330
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JW James Wood LHB .398
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .431 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 CA CJ Abrams LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 444 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .365
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CM Curtis Mead RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Curtis Mead
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-11 game page →