PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .279vs RHH xwOBA .276Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Cutter 24%Sinker 16%Curveball 11%Slider 1%Sweeper 1%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .337
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MS Marcus Semien RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 520 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BB Brett Baty LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 362 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 FL Francisco Lindor SH .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 608 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JS Juan Soto LHB .417
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Juan Soto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .457 xwOBA over 468 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 350 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JY Jared Young LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-13 game page →