PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .281vs RHH xwOBA .279Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Cutter 24%Sinker 16%Curveball 11%Slider 1%Sweeper 1%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .333
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 603 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 499 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MM Max Muncy LHB .367
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MB Mookie Betts RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 474 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TE Tommy Edman SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 HF Hunter Feduccia LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Feduccia
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AC Alex Call RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Call
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.