PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .277vs RHH xwOBA .275Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Cutter 24%Sinker 16%Curveball 11%Slider 1%Sweeper 1%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .335
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 642 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 596 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .373
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 458 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 341 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JS Jesús Sánchez LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jesús Sánchez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 412 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-19 game page →