PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs St. Louis Cardinals

How the St. Louis Cardinals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .284vs RHH xwOBA .281Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Cutter 25%Sinker 15%Curveball 10%Slider 1%Sweeper 1%

How the St. Louis Cardinals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the St. Louis Cardinals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 AB Alec Burleson LHB .359
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Burleson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JW Jordan Walker RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jordan Walker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JW JJ Wetherholt LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Wetherholt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 IH Iván Herrera RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Iván Herrera
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MW Masyn Winn RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Masyn Winn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 509 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 NC Nathan Church LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Church
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JF José Fermín RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Fermín
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 379 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 PP Pedro Pagés RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pedro Pagés
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-03 game page →