PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs St. Louis Cardinals

How the St. Louis Cardinals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .273vs RHH xwOBA .277Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Cutter 24%Sinker 16%Curveball 11%Slider 1%Sweeper 1%

How the St. Louis Cardinals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the St. Louis Cardinals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 JW Jordan Walker RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jordan Walker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 AB Alec Burleson LHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Burleson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 532 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 IH Iván Herrera RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Iván Herrera
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JW JJ Wetherholt LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Wetherholt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 MW Masyn Winn RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Masyn Winn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 NC Nathan Church LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Church
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JF José Fermín RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Fermín
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 NG Nolan Gorman LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Gorman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 PP Pedro Pagés RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pedro Pagés
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.