PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs St. Louis Cardinals

How the St. Louis Cardinals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .277vs RHH xwOBA .275Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Cutter 24%Sinker 16%Curveball 11%Slider 1%Sweeper 1%

How the St. Louis Cardinals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the St. Louis Cardinals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 AB Alec Burleson LHB .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Burleson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 524 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JW Jordan Walker RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jordan Walker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 IH Iván Herrera RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Iván Herrera
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 384 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JW JJ Wetherholt LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Wetherholt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 MW Masyn Winn RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Masyn Winn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 535 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 NC Nathan Church LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Church
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JF José Fermín RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Fermín
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 NG Nolan Gorman LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Gorman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 359 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 PP Pedro Pagés RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pedro Pagés
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.