PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .273vs RHH xwOBA .277Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Cutter 24%Sinker 16%Curveball 11%Slider 1%Sweeper 1%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .328
  1. 1 MO Matt Olson LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 690 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 OA Ozzie Albies SH .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 525 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 MH Michael Harris II LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AR Austin Riley RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 RA Ronald Acuña Jr. RHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ronald Acuña Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 540 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JJ Jim Jarvis LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jim Jarvis
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SM Sean Murphy RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sean Murphy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.