PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .274vs RHH xwOBA .275Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Cutter 25%Sinker 16%Curveball 11%Slider 1%Sweeper 1%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .328
  1. 1 MO Matt Olson LHB .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 669 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 OA Ozzie Albies SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 MH Michael Harris II LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 421 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MD Mauricio Dubón RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mauricio Dubón
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 405 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AR Austin Riley RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 RA Ronald Acuña Jr. RHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ronald Acuña Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 528 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DS Dominic Smith LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.