PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .284vs RHH xwOBA .281Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Cutter 25%Sinker 15%Curveball 10%Slider 1%Sweeper 1%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .327
  1. 1 OA Ozzie Albies SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 448 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 MO Matt Olson LHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 613 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MH Michael Harris II LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 384 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AR Austin Riley RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 432 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MD Mauricio Dubón RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mauricio Dubón
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 369 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .358
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LT Lane Thomas RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lane Thomas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 498 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DS Dominic Smith LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-09 game page →