PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs Toronto Blue Jays

How the Toronto Blue Jays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .290vs RHH xwOBA .278Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 49%Cutter 25%Sinker 14%Curveball 10%Slider 2%Sweeper 1%

How the Toronto Blue Jays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Toronto Blue Jays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .326
  1. 1 EC Ernie Clement SH .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ernie Clement
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KO Kazuma Okamoto RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kazuma Okamoto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vladimir Guerrero Jr. RHB .368
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AG Andrés Giménez LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrés Giménez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JS Jesús Sánchez LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jesús Sánchez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 GS George Springer RHB .359
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. George Springer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 379 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BV Brandon Valenzuela SH .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Valenzuela
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 YP Yohendrick Piñango LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Yohendrick Piñango
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NL Nathan Lukes LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Lukes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.