PITCHER MATCHUP

Cam Schlittler vs Toronto Blue Jays

How the Toronto Blue Jays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cam Schlittler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cam Schlittler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .279vs RHH xwOBA .276Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Cutter 24%Sinker 16%Curveball 11%Slider 1%Sweeper 1%

How the Toronto Blue Jays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Toronto Blue Jays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cam Schlittler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 EC Ernie Clement SH .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ernie Clement
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 KO Kazuma Okamoto RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kazuma Okamoto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vladimir Guerrero Jr. RHB .359
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 444 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 AG Andrés Giménez LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrés Giménez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 446 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GS George Springer RHB .358
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. George Springer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 429 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 364 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 NL Nathan Lukes LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Lukes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MS Myles Straw RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Myles Straw
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AK Alejandro Kirk RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Kirk
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 BV Brandon Valenzuela SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Valenzuela
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.