PITCHER MATCHUP

Cade Gibson vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cade Gibson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cade Gibson's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .300vs RHH xwOBA .283Seasons 2026–2025
Curveball 24%Sinker 23%Sweeper 21%Slider 13%Changeup 11%Four-Seam Fastball 7%Unknown 1%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cade Gibson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 504 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .409 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 621 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 BH Bryce Harper LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 AB Alec Bohm RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 386 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 517 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BS Bryson Stott LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 583 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JC Justin Crawford LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 ES Edmundo Sosa RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edmundo Sosa
    • Curveball (24% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (7% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.