PITCHER MATCHUP

Cade Cavalli vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cade Cavalli's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cade Cavalli's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .297vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Knuckle Curve 27%Sinker 14%Sweeper 12%Changeup 9%Cutter 5%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cade Cavalli, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .329
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .411 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 505 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 336 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 TG Trent Grisham LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 548 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 JC José Caballero RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 348 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.