PITCHER MATCHUP

Cade Cavalli vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cade Cavalli's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cade Cavalli's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .293vs RHH xwOBA .304Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Knuckle Curve 26%Sinker 14%Sweeper 13%Changeup 9%Cutter 6%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cade Cavalli, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .327
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 643 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AP Andy Pages RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .406 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TE Tommy Edman SH .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WS Will Smith RHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.