PITCHER MATCHUP

Cade Cavalli vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cade Cavalli's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cade Cavalli's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .296vs RHH xwOBA .315Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Knuckle Curve 27%Sinker 14%Sweeper 12%Changeup 9%Cutter 5%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cade Cavalli, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 605 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MM Max Muncy LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 323 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MB Mookie Betts RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 477 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 405 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TE Tommy Edman SH .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AF Alex Freeland SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 HF Hunter Feduccia LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Feduccia
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-05 game page →