PITCHER MATCHUP

Cade Cavalli vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cade Cavalli's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cade Cavalli's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .293vs RHH xwOBA .304Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Knuckle Curve 26%Sinker 14%Sweeper 13%Changeup 9%Cutter 6%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cade Cavalli, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 535 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JL Josh Lowe LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .278
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (26% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.