PITCHER MATCHUP

Cade Cavalli vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cade Cavalli's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cade Cavalli's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .293vs RHH xwOBA .310Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Knuckle Curve 27%Sinker 14%Sweeper 12%Changeup 9%Cutter 5%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cade Cavalli, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 502 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (27% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-11 game page →