PITCHER MATCHUP

Bubba Chandler vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Bubba Chandler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Bubba Chandler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .317vs RHH xwOBA .293Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 50%Slider 18%Changeup 17%Sinker 6%Sweeper 5%Curveball 5%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Bubba Chandler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .305
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Four-Seam Fastball (50% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (50% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 468 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (50% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JY Jacob Young RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (50% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DC Dylan Crews RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Four-Seam Fastball (50% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (50% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (50% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BH Brady House RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Four-Seam Fastball (50% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JT José Tena LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Tena
    • Four-Seam Fastball (50% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.