PITCHER MATCHUP

Bubba Chandler vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Bubba Chandler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Bubba Chandler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .322vs RHH xwOBA .303Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 49%Slider 19%Changeup 16%Sinker 7%Curveball 5%Sweeper 4%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Bubba Chandler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .331
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MS Marcus Semien RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 534 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 BB Brett Baty LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 FL Francisco Lindor SH .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 638 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JS Juan Soto LHB .404
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Juan Soto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .445 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JY Jared Young LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.