PITCHER MATCHUP

Bubba Chandler vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Bubba Chandler's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Bubba Chandler's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .317vs RHH xwOBA .290Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 49%Slider 18%Changeup 16%Sinker 7%Curveball 5%Sweeper 4%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Bubba Chandler, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 634 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 586 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .230 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.