PITCHER MATCHUP

Bryan Woo vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Bryan Woo's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Bryan Woo's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .302vs RHH xwOBA .259Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Sinker 22%Slider 12%Sweeper 11%Changeup 7%Curveball 1%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Bryan Woo, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 665 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JP Joc Pederson LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.