PITCHER MATCHUP

Bryan Woo vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Bryan Woo's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Bryan Woo's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .300vs RHH xwOBA .255Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Sinker 22%Slider 13%Sweeper 11%Changeup 7%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Bryan Woo, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 588 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JJ Josh Jung RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JP Joc Pederson LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 392 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 AO Alejandro Osuna LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Osuna
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-25 game page →