PITCHER MATCHUP

Bryan Woo vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Bryan Woo's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Bryan Woo's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .298vs RHH xwOBA .260Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Sinker 22%Slider 13%Sweeper 10%Changeup 7%Curveball 1%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Bryan Woo, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .326
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 336 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 679 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 369 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .374
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 580 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .448 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 AB Alec Bohm RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 473 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BH Bryce Harper LHB .375
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 432 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BS Bryson Stott LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 546 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 399 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-26 game page →