PITCHER MATCHUP

Bryan Woo vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Bryan Woo's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Bryan Woo's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .302vs RHH xwOBA .259Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Sinker 22%Slider 12%Sweeper 11%Changeup 7%Curveball 1%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Bryan Woo, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 504 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 719 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .368
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 621 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .439 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .374
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 AB Alec Bohm RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 517 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 386 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 583 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.