PITCHER MATCHUP

Bryan Woo vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Bryan Woo's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Bryan Woo's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .294vs RHH xwOBA .259Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Sinker 22%Slider 12%Sweeper 11%Changeup 7%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Bryan Woo, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 436 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 402 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 491 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JS Jorge Soler RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JL Josh Lowe LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 WM Wade Meckler LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (12% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-30 game page →