PITCHER MATCHUP

Braydon Fisher vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Braydon Fisher's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Braydon Fisher's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .327vs RHH xwOBA .282Seasons 2026–2025
Slider 44%Curveball 32%Four-Seam Fastball 21%Cutter 3%Unknown 1%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Braydon Fisher, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 583 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 529 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TG Trent Grisham LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 442 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC José Caballero RHB .275
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 446 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 454 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 368 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.