PITCHER MATCHUP

Braydon Fisher vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Braydon Fisher's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Braydon Fisher's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .276Seasons 2026–2025
Slider 44%Curveball 32%Four-Seam Fastball 20%Cutter 3%Unknown 1%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Braydon Fisher, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 313 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 RG Riley Greene LHB .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Riley Greene
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 550 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 CK Colt Keith LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 415 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 432 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 GT Gleyber Torres RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gleyber Torres
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 511 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JB Javier Báez SH .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Báez
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-15 game page →