PITCHER MATCHUP

Braydon Fisher vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Braydon Fisher's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Braydon Fisher's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .327vs RHH xwOBA .282Seasons 2026–2025
Slider 44%Curveball 32%Four-Seam Fastball 21%Cutter 3%Unknown 1%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Braydon Fisher, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 RG Riley Greene LHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Riley Greene
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 566 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 CK Colt Keith LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JB Javier Báez SH .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Báez
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MC Max Clark LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Clark
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.