PITCHER MATCHUP

Braydon Fisher vs Boston Red Sox

How the Boston Red Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Braydon Fisher's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Braydon Fisher's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .276Seasons 2026–2025
Slider 44%Curveball 32%Four-Seam Fastball 20%Cutter 3%Unknown 1%

How the Boston Red Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Boston Red Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Braydon Fisher, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .303
  1. 1 WA Wilyer Abreu LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wilyer Abreu
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 494 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JD Jarren Duran LHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jarren Duran
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 640 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 CD Caleb Durbin RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Caleb Durbin
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 WC Willson Contreras RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willson Contreras
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 AR Adley Rutschman SH .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adley Rutschman
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 446 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 AM Andruw Monasterio RHB .280
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andruw Monasterio
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 TS Trevor Story RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trevor Story
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CW Connor Wong RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Wong
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NS Nick Sogard SH .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Sogard
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.