PITCHER MATCHUP

Braydon Fisher vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Braydon Fisher's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Braydon Fisher's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .311vs RHH xwOBA .287Seasons 2026–2025
Slider 44%Curveball 32%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Cutter 4%Unknown 1%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Braydon Fisher, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BB Brett Baty LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JS Juan Soto LHB .379
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Juan Soto
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .436 xwOBA over 444 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MV Mark Vientos RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mark Vientos
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LT Luis Torrens RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Torrens
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 FL Francisco Lindor SH .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 526 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-01 game page →