PITCHER MATCHUP

Braydon Fisher vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Braydon Fisher's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Braydon Fisher's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .327vs RHH xwOBA .282Seasons 2026–2025
Slider 44%Curveball 32%Four-Seam Fastball 21%Cutter 3%Unknown 1%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Braydon Fisher, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MS Marcus Semien RHB .270
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .236 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 534 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BB Brett Baty LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 FL Francisco Lindor SH .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 638 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 JS Juan Soto LHB .373
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Juan Soto
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .425 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MV Mark Vientos RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mark Vientos
    • Slider (44% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (32% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.