PITCHER MATCHUP

Brayan Bello vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brayan Bello's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brayan Bello's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .357vs RHH xwOBA .302Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 37%Changeup 19%Sweeper 18%Cutter 13%Four-Seam Fastball 11%Curveball 2%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brayan Bello, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (11% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .356
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (11% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (11% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (11% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 535 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (11% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JL Josh Lowe LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (11% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Sinker (37% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (11% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.