PITCHER MATCHUP

Brayan Bello vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brayan Bello's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brayan Bello's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .362vs RHH xwOBA .306Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 38%Changeup 19%Sweeper 18%Cutter 14%Four-Seam Fastball 11%Curveball 2%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brayan Bello, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .307
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (11% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (11% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 498 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (11% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JL Josh Lowe LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (11% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Sinker (38% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (11% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-07 game page →