PITCHER MATCHUP

Brandon Young vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brandon Young's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brandon Young's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .319Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 41%Splitter 18%Slider 14%Curveball 13%Sinker 11%Cutter 2%Changeup 1%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brandon Young, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 504 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 719 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 621 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .455 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 AB Alec Bohm RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 517 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 386 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 583 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.