PITCHER MATCHUP

Brandon Young vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brandon Young's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brandon Young's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .332vs RHH xwOBA .299Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 42%Splitter 19%Slider 13%Curveball 13%Sinker 9%Cutter 3%Changeup 2%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brandon Young, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 448 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 AB Alec Bohm RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 451 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 337 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BH Bryce Harper LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 410 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 550 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .446 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 512 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 JC Justin Crawford LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 ES Edmundo Sosa RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edmundo Sosa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-31 game page →