PITCHER MATCHUP

Brandon Young vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brandon Young's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brandon Young's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .322vs RHH xwOBA .327Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 42%Splitter 18%Slider 14%Curveball 13%Sinker 10%Cutter 2%Changeup 1%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brandon Young, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 341 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 MS Marcus Semien RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 521 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .224 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 341 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BB Brett Baty LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 362 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 FL Francisco Lindor SH .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 611 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JS Juan Soto LHB .397
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Juan Soto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .448 xwOBA over 471 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 350 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JY Jared Young LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (42% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (18% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (2% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-14 game page →