PITCHER MATCHUP

Brandon Young vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brandon Young's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brandon Young's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .334vs RHH xwOBA .308Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 41%Splitter 19%Slider 13%Curveball 13%Sinker 9%Cutter 3%Changeup 1%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brandon Young, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 573 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 467 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .236 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AC Alex Call RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Call
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.