PITCHER MATCHUP

Brandon Young vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Brandon Young's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Brandon Young's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .337vs RHH xwOBA .301Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 41%Splitter 20%Curveball 13%Slider 13%Sinker 8%Cutter 4%Changeup 2%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Brandon Young, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 521 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .406 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 401 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 AF Alex Freeland SH .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AC Alex Call RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Call
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (20% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (13% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (2% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-21 game page →